Find
New Coalition Demands Transparency in Federal and State Recovery Spending
New Coalition Demands Transparency in Federal and State Recovery Spending; Poll Shows Public Support for Accountability Thursday, February 5, 2009PERMALINK: http://http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22641
New Coalition Demands Transparency in Federal and State Recovery Spending; Poll Shows Public Support for Accountability With the federal government about to transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to the states, with many of those funds going to private contractors, a broad-based, bi-partisan coalition of organizations has come together in a Coalition for an Accountable Recovery. The Coalition, which Progressive States Network participated in creating, is promoting reforms at both the federal and state level to assure transparency in how funds are used by federal and state contractors, the number of jobs created, and the quality of jobs created-- with the results posted online in easily searchable websites for the public.
Unfortunately, the current federal recovery bill does not require that states to publicly track the funds or create public websites to show how they are spending the money, despite the fact that state governments will be responsible for dispensing over half the funds.
With the public demanding job creation results from the recovery package, enacting similar laws in every state to ensure transparency and accountability in state contracting should be a top priority this legislative session.
State Unemployment Insurance Systems Being Modernized in Anticipation of Federal Recovery Program Funds When Governor O'Malley (D-MD) announced his legislative agenda for the session, one centerpiece was an expansion of unemployment insurance to part-time workers currently excluded. Other states, including California, Hawaii, Oregon, Colorado, Minnesota, Iowa, Utah, and Texas are passing that and other reforms to modernize antiquated systems that leave many unemployed without help. In fact, due to state rules, only 17 percent of low-wage unemployed workers and 37 percent of higher-wage unemployed workers are receiving benefits. States are acting partly in anticipation of new federal help that, as we outlined in a December Dispatch, advocates have been pushing for and the House included in their original version of the federal recovery package. That version included $7 billion for the Unemployment Insurance Moderization Act ( S. 1871/H.R. 3920, Title IV) which would provide incentive payments to states that have or will implement initiatives to help low-wage, women, and part-time workers get through these tough times. Over the past decade, more than half the states have already adopted the reforms that qualify for incentive funding under the UIMA. Models for Reform: Legislative language on the provisions falls into several categories:
The National Employment Law Project has outlined models for unemployment insurance expansion here with a state by state guide as to what each state needs to do to achieve UIMA reforms to qualify for federal funding. Reforms Can Encourage Reemployment: Despite concerns that expanding eligibility for unemployed residents will bear too great a financial burden, lessons can be drawn from North Carolina, which extended unemployment insurance benefits three years ago to part-time workers and those with sporadic or only recent work history. Employment Security Commission president Tom Whitaker found that the change resulted in fewer repeat claims and no significant increase in total benefits: "Instead, we've moved more people from the unemployment line to the re-employment line and decreased our workload." Health benefits for the unemployed Another key reform included in the current House version of the recovery package is a temporary expansion of Medicaid to cover unemployed individuals up to 200% of the poverty line, while providing a 65% subsidy for coverage under former employer health plans under the COBRA program for those making more. Unfortunately, the current Senate bill strips most of those provision out, leaving the unemployed vulnerable to medical catastrophe. Amidst the federal stimulus debate around health care for unemployed workers, Families USA has released an important report detailing what states can do to protect unemployed workers' coverage. The report provides state-by-state recommendations for immediate action by legislators - these include enacting "mini-COBRA" laws and allowing individuals who have lost employer coverage to purchase coverage in the indvidual market from their previous insurers without limitations for pre-existing conditions. Need for Congress to Act: With several states are facing insolvent UI benefit funds as unemployed residents flood the rolls and facing the loss of health care from their previous employers, it is even more important that Congress pass the stimulus package to ensure that state unemployment funds can stay solvent and states can reform. Notably, unemployment benefits go a long way to stimulate the economy , providing $2.15 in economic growth for every dollar in benefits spent by workers and their families on housing, groceries and other basic necessities.
States Advance National Health Care Debate with Key Reforms While the effort for federal health care reform recovers from the withdrawl of former Sen. Majority Leader Tom Daschle to lead President Obama's health care reform efforts, state legislators are moving forward with a medley of health care bills - both incremental and comprehensive in scope. These reforms reflect key priorities for federal reform and can be tapped to bolster the public's support for the federal effort.
SCHIP "Down Payment" on Health Care Reform Is Signed Into Law Calling it "a down payment on my commitment to cover every single American", President Obama signed into law an expansion of SCHIP, the State Children's Health Insurance Program. The law, twice vetoed by President Bush, will enable states to expand coverage to 4 million uninsured children by 2013 and maintain coverage for the roughly 7 million currently enrolled in the program. The law signed by President Obama includes several key advances:
Passage of the SCHIP expansion is seen as an early win for the Obama Administration and the new Congress, and an important step towards broader health care reform. In signing the legislation, President Obama said, this "is just one component of a much broader effort to finally bring our health care system into the twenty-first century." Similarly, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “This is the beginning of the change that the American people voted for in the last election, and that we will achieve with President Barack Obama."
Taking Action to Protect PEG Public Access Stations- Illinois Investigating AT&T
AT&T's cutting-edge television service, U-Verse, is creating frustration for community programming advocates and being investigated by both state and federal officials. After receiving a large number of complaints, Illinois Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan, launched an investigation into the U-Verse system's underminging of access to PEG channels (i.e. Public Education and Government stations). Additionally, according the Chicago Tribune, the Federal Communications Commission is currently reviewing petitions from coalitions representing "thousands of towns, schools and community groups which demands a ruling declaring AT&T in violation of rules about fair treatment of public programming." As Helen Soule of the Alliance for Community Media, argues, "[t]he Alliance, its members and its coalition partners are simply asking that PEG channels receive the same quality standards of delivery as commercial channels." As the digital transition approaches and cable operators move around services in order to increase space for high-definition content, faster Internet speed and Wireless Broadband services, advocates of public access channels are fighting to ensure that PEG channels will not just disappear. AT&T is not the only cable provider that has used the digital transition as a mechanism to "channel-slam" PEG stations. As we highlighted last year, Comcast attempted to move Michigan PEG channels off the "basic" tier of services and stick them in "digital delivery." This move placed the channels in the 900 range, making them unavailable to a large number of cable subscribers. Charter Communications took similar actions in Reno, Nev., and Wisconsin last year. The U-Verse Problem: The specific controversy with U-Verse revolves around whether or not the service violates state law and federal rules requiring service providers to give community programming equivalent treatment to broadcast channels. While AT&T claims it is giving similar access, public access supporters make a strong case that the communications company is simply not meeting its legal duty. Under the U-Verse system PEG programs are placed on Channel 99. From Channel 99 individuals must find their way through on-screen menus to the town and program they want. Programs on Channel 99 besides being hard to locate, also take a long time to load (watch this video example) and cannot be digitally recorded. Need to Reform Video Franchising Rules: One reason that PEG stations are being channel slammed is that over the last few years 20 states have implemented state video franchising agreements where PEG stations were not clearly defined nor were the guidelines of how to treat PEG stations adequately spelled-out. Local governments who had traditionally supported PEG stations, lost much of there ability to set rules or standards under those state franchising agreements. For example, while many local Michigan officials wanted to protect PEG channels from Comcast's plans to move the stations out of the basic tier, the recently enacted uniform video services local franchise act, Public Act 480, greatly diminished legislators power to stop Comcast. In order to ensure that PEG stations continue to be available to the public states should consider returning franchise authority to a local level, or in the least, revisiting their state video franchising laws to strengthen PEG protections.
ResourcesNew Coalition Demands Transparency in Federal and State Recovery Spending; Poll Shows Public Support for Accountability Progressive States Network - Privatizing in the Dark: The Pitfalls of Privatization & Why Budget Disclosure is Needed State Unemployment Insurance Systems Being Modernized in Anticipation of Federal Recovery Program Funds Progressive States, Unemployment Insurance Modernization Should be Part of Recovery Plan States Advance National Health Care Debate with Key Reforms Progressive States Network - Health Care for All
SCHIP "Down Payment" on Health Care Reform Is Signed Into LawFamilies USA - Children's Health Taking Action to Protect PEG Public Access Stations- Illinois Investigating AT&T Alliance for Community Media 3 Steps Forward 1. Congress, states try to harness West winds 2 Steps Back 1. CA: California bond rating drops lower than any other state's MastheadThe Stateside Dispatch is written and edited by: Nathan Newman, Interim Executive Director Please shoot us an email at dispatch@progressivestates.org if you have feedback, tips, suggestions, criticisms, or nominations for any of our sidebar features.
To unsubscribe: Click here
|
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Printer-friendly version
Comments
Login or Register to comment.