<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/policy/issue/68/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Texas Again Demonstrates the Pitfalls of Privatization</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24738</link>
 <description>This past week, the &lt;i&gt;Dallas
Morning News&lt;/i&gt; revealed that a key figure who contributed to the 
privatization of Texas&#039; food stamp eligibility program is now 
receiving taxpayer dollars to help fix the problems that the private 
system created.  regg Phillips, who was Deputy Commissioner at the Texas Health and Human
Services Commission (HHSC) and led the push for privatization a few 
years ago, now heads AutoGov Inc., a company that has received $207,500 
from the state government in the past four months to assist in 
eliminating the errors in the provision and eligibility determination of
the state&#039;s food stamp program. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24738&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/157">Strenthen Contractor Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/135">Close the Revolving Door</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/148">Reform Government Contracts and Restrict Privatization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/2">Alabama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/4">Arizona</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/12">Hawaii</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/15">Indiana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/46">Vermont</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:23:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24738 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eye on the Right: Adding Anti-Gay Provision to Wasteful Film Tax Credits in Florida</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24709</link>
 <description>PSN has noted in previous Dispatches, these credits are costly, favor out-of-state workers, offer minimal to no returns, do not create permanent jobs,
and place an excessive burden on taxpayers in a time of economic
uncertainty.  The Massachusetts Department of Revenue recently
determined that in twelve states that administer a film tax credit, the
return is extremely meager-- finding that states were only getting back &amp;quot;$.0.07 to $.0.28 per dollar of tax credit granted.&amp;quot;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/147">Fix Failed Tax Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/10">Florida</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24709 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>2.4 Million Jobs Supported by the Recovery Act - and a Depression Averted</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24593</link>
 <description>This week marks the one-year anniversary of the passage of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).  The annual report by the White
House task force monitoring the impact of ARRA funds, led by
Vice-President Joe Biden, finds that
up to 2.4 million jobs have been created or saved in both the public
and private sector as a result of federal recovery efforts. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24593&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:27:25 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24593 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eye on the Right: Opposing the Recovery While Taking Credit for the Results</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24590</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
How do we know the Recovery Act is working?
&lt;/p&gt;
Over 70 members of the House of Representatives vociferously opposed ARRA, but returned to their home districts to take credit
for job creation, investments in infrastructure and the green economy,
and spending on critical community needs.  Many of these same lawmakers
requested further federal funds for projects in their states. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24590&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:15:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24590 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Job Creation and State Fiscal Relief Resolutions Moving in the States</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24559</link>
 <description>In the State of the Union speech, President Barack Obama stated, &amp;quot;...jobs must be our number-one focus in 2010, and that&#039;s why I&#039;m calling for a new jobs bill.&amp;quot;
With the fiscal crisis forcing states to layoff hundreds of thousands
of teachers, nurses and police officers, the need for more federal job
creation and state fiscal relief support is clear.  And there is
substantial momentum building around this issue in the states.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24559&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1815">Green Collar Workforce Development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/204">Improve Transit Options</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/96">Unemployment Insurance Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/223">Physical Infrastructure Investments</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/193">Quality K-12 Education</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/111">Using Medicaid and SCHIP to Cover Adults</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/206">Fix Transit Infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/195">Adult Retraining</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/14">Illinois</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/20">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/29">Nevada</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/32">New Mexico</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/46">Vermont</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:12:03 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24559 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eye on the Right: Arizona&#039;s Failed Experiment with Tax Cuts</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
How are Arizona&#039;s right-wing legislators responding to the state&#039;s most severe fiscal crisis since the Great Depression?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Massive corporate income tax cuts, of course.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24557&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24557 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Revenue Options in 2010: Making the Case and Debunking the Myths</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24497</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last Tuesday, Oregonians overwhelmingly approved
two ballot initiatives that ratified legislative action last year to
increase high-end personal income and corporate taxes.  The failure of the anti-tax movement in Oregon
is one more in a long stream of right-wing initiatives
rejected by voters at the ballot box.  In fact, progressive revenue
generation as part of a balanced approach to addressing state deficits
has been popular with both voters and legislatures for years.  This &lt;i&gt;Dispatch&lt;/i&gt;
will provide both the facts and messages to debunk opposition to smart
revenue options, while outlining a few of the best revenue approaches
to filling budget holes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24497&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1777">Broaden Sales Taxes to Include Services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1838">Earned Income Tax Credit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/146">Make Tax Systems More Progressive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/153">Review and Sunset Tax Expenditures</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/149">Tax Disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1780">Stop Tax Subsidy Bidding Wars</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24497 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>States Act to Limit Judicial Ruling Allowing Corporations to Spend Directly to Elect or Defeat Candidates</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24494</link>
 <description>Portending a sharp increase in corporate political spending, the Supreme Court has ruled (&lt;i&gt;Citizens United v. FEC&lt;/i&gt;)
that corporations enjoy the same speech rights of citizens when it
comes to advocating the election or defeating political candidates.
Elected officials, including U.S. President Barack Obama, have
denounced the ruling as striking at the heart of our democracy by
putting corporations on an equal footing with real people when it comes
to basic constitutional rights. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24494&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1730">Reduce Influence of Money in Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/136">Ban Pay to Play Campaign Contributions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/133">Disclosure and Oversight</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1">All 50 States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:12:10 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24494 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tuesday&#039;s Lesson: Bold State Leadership Needed More than Ever</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24446</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Gridlock.  Slow fulfillment of promises of change in D.C.  A health
care bill so compromised that even supporters are unhappy with many
details. Frustration with D.C. seemed to be the clearest message from Massachusetts voters on Tuesday. But what can we expect other than gridlock and resistance when a
59-seat super-majority in the U.S. Senate is insufficient to pass
serious legislation?  Or when monied interests in D.C. buy off support
to block serious reforms on financial regulations, health care and
climate change legislation? This is why bold, progressive leadership in the states matters. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24446&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/163">Federal Preemption Must Be Explicit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/69">Progressive Federalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1819">Federal Funding for State Innovation</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:19:02 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24446 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Federal Officials Critical of Privatization Debacles in the States</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24445</link>
 <description>In a meeting with Texas officials
last week, Kevin Concannon, Under Secretary of Food, Nutrition, and
Consumer Services at the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), claimed that there had been a drastic reduction in the
timeliness and accuracy of food stamp provisions in the state following
the implementation of a privatized system.  In fact, Texas now has the
worst performing food stamp program in the entire country.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24445&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/156">Measure and Disclose the Costs of Public Contracts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/157">Strenthen Contractor Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/148">Reform Government Contracts and Restrict Privatization</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:16:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24445 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
