Find
Protect Womens Rights
From the Dispatch
-
After Benefiting From Voter Furor Over Economy, Conservatives Prioritize Divisive Social Agenda in States
Dec 02, 2010
The morning after Election Day, conservative candidates across the country woke up to find themselves the beneficiaries of an historic national wave of voter anger over the state of the economy and record unemployment. Yet in the first few weeks after this clear voter statement of frustration over the economy, conservative state lawmakers across the fifty states are already making it clear that their legislative priorities next year will include pushing a divisive social agenda - an agenda that remained largely hidden during the campaign.
-
New State Laws Limit Reproductive Rights
Apr 29, 2010
Recent laws in Nebraska and Oklahoma highlight how a number of right-wing state leaders are attacking women's reproductive freedom. These bills range from replacing the viability standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court, to forcing women to watch an ultrasound as their doctors explain the status of the fetus, to precluding women from suing their doctors if the latter misinforms women of the well-being of their fetuses.
-
Defeating Ultrasound Requirements to Protect Women's Health Access
Sep 03, 2009
In a significant decision last month, an Oklahoma County District Court ruled that a 2008 anti-choice law violated the state constitution. The law in question (SB 1878) was more burdensome than any prior bill regulating pre-abortion ultrasounds passed in the country, requiring women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a doctor describe fetal characteristics before consenting to the procedure. Opponents argued that the law invades a woman's right to privacy and violates doctors' freedom of speech. -
Kansas Supreme Court Protects Patient Privacy in Abortion Case
Feb 07, 2008
The Kansas State Supreme Court temporarily blocked a grand jury investigating an abortion provider from collecting more than 2,000 patient records, including patients who didn't end up having an abortion. The provider, Dr. Tiller, and his attorneys objected to the subpoena of patient records as a violation of women's constitutional rights. The Center for Reproductive Rights also filed a petition on behalf of patients to stop the subpoena's. The Court, at least for now, agreed the subpoenas raised "significant issues" about patients' privacy. A final decision will be made by February 25th.