Defeating Ultrasound Requirements to Protect Women's Health Access

Julie Bero — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:22:15 -0700

In a significant decision last month, an Oklahoma County District Court ruled that a 2008 anti-choice law violated the state constitution. The law in question (SB 1878) was more burdensome than any prior bill regulating pre-abortion ultrasounds passed in the country, requiring women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a doctor describe fetal characteristics before consenting to the procedure. Opponents argued that the law invades a woman's right to privacy and violates doctors' freedom of speech.

Kansas Supreme Court Protects Patient Privacy in Abortion Case

Adam Thompson — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:44:00 -0800

The Kansas State Supreme Court temporarily blocked a grand jury investigating an abortion provider from collecting more than 2,000 patient records, including patients who didn't end up having an abortion. The provider, Dr. Tiller, and his attorneys objected to the subpoena of patient records as a violation of women's constitutional rights. The Center for Reproductive Rights also filed a petition on behalf of patients to stop the subpoena's. The Court, at least for now, agreed the subpoenas raised "significant issues" about patients' privacy. A final decision will be made by February 25th.

From the Dispatch

Defeating Ultrasound Requirements to Protect Women's Health Access

Kansas Supreme Court Protects Patient Privacy in Abortion Case