<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/policy/issue/1835/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>9th Circuit Strikes Down Washington&#039;s Felon Voting Law</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24412</link>
 <description>Last week the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of disenfranchised felons in Washington, holding in a summary judgment order
that the state&#039;s practice of denying the vote to felons violates the
federal Voting Rights Act (VRA).  Notably, instead of basing their
argument on the nature of the felon disenfranchisement law at issue,
the case centered on the interaction between felon disenfranchisement
and the discrimination in the criminal justice system itself.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24412&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1735">National Voter Registration Act Compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/145">Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/47">Virginia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/50">Wisconsin</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:50:19 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24412 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Protecting the Unemployed from Abusive Credit Inquiries</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23371</link>
 <description>As the economic downturn progresses, American workers are facing a
disturbing rise in employers using credit ratings to determine job
worthiness.  According to a 2006 survey by the Society for Human Resource Management,
the number of firms using credit histories to screen applicants rose
from 25% in 1998 to 43% despite such inquiries often being
discriminatory and even illegal.  
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23371&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1835">Stop Race Discrimination</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/61">Civil Liberties</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/57">Consumer Protection &amp;amp; Corporate Accountability</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/75">Pension Protection &amp;amp; Asset Accumulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1837">Privacy Protection</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/6">California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/8">Connecticut</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/12">Hawaii</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/15">Indiana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/23">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/33">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/36">Ohio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:40:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Caroline Fan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23371 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Path Breaking Voter Registration Modernization Bill is Vetoed by Minnesota Governor Pawlenty</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Minnesota legislators passed a landmark voter registration modernization bill
recently that would, absent a veto, have registered or updated the
registration of voters automatically when they applied for a driver&#039;s
license, learner&#039;s permit or ID card.  It would also use information in
motor vehicle and corrections databases to verify and maintain voter
rolls.  This legislation, sponsored by Rep. Steve Simon and Sen. John Marty,
would have made Minnesota the first state in the nation to proactively
register voters, and made it among the most advanced in maintaining
clean, accurate voter rolls.  The bill was designed to build on the
state&#039;s already first-in-the-nation portability bill, which requires automatic updates to voter registrations based on changes of address.
&lt;/p&gt;
However, Governor Pawlenty vetoed this historic legislation last week...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23135&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1733">Improving Voter List Maintenance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1734">Voter Registration Modernization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1735">National Voter Registration Act Compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/67">Clean and Fair Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/145">Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Felons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/24">Minnesota</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:18:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23135 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>African-American Incarceration in State Prisons for Drug Crimes Drops 22% in Six Years</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22982</link>
 <description>A report byThe Sentencing Project released this week shows that the number of African-Americans in state prisons for drug crimes dropped 21.6% from 1999-2005, a reduction of more than 31,000 individuals.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22982&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/186">Eliminate Racial Bias in Criminal Justice System</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:33:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Smith-Socaris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22982 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Racial Impact Statements:  Addressing Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice Systems</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22559</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
 The most recent edition of the American Bar Association&lt;i&gt;&#039;&lt;/i&gt;s&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;magazine,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/upload/2009/01/second_state_to_approve_racial/ABA_article_-_09.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Criminal Justice&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
highlights a new tool -- racial impact statements -- that states are
using to address the racial disparity in their criminal justice
systems.  The problem of disparate treatment was highlighted in two 2007
reports detailing the critical failure of states to administer justice
without regard to race or ethnicity.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22559&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/186">Eliminate Racial Bias in Criminal Justice System</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1">All 50 States</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22559 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Overcoming Racial Discrimination</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/614/overcoming-racial-discrimination</link>
 <description>Despite real progress over the last generation in overcoming discrimination in our society, the reality is that Americans are still regularly refused employment, housing or equal treatment under the law because of their nationality or the color of their skin.  The numbers highlighting this racial discrimination are stark: 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/614/overcoming-racial-discrimination&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1835">Stop Race Discrimination</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1">All 50 States</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/4">Arizona</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/5">Arkansas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/6">California</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/7">Colorado</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/8">Connecticut</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/10">Florida</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/14">Illinois</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/15">Indiana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/18">Kentucky</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/19">Louisiana</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/22">Massachusetts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/31">New Jersey</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/33">New York</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/34">North Carolina</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/38">Oregon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/44">Texas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 05:41:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21689 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
