<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.progressivestates.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>From the Dispatch</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/policy/issue/146/dispatch</link>
 <description>Dispatch (w arg for policy resource context)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Eye on the Right: Adding Anti-Gay Provision to Wasteful Film Tax Credits in Florida</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24709</link>
 <description>PSN has noted in previous Dispatches, these credits are costly, favor out-of-state workers, offer minimal to no returns, do not create permanent jobs,
and place an excessive burden on taxpayers in a time of economic
uncertainty.  The Massachusetts Department of Revenue recently
determined that in twelve states that administer a film tax credit, the
return is extremely meager-- finding that states were only getting back &amp;quot;$.0.07 to $.0.28 per dollar of tax credit granted.&amp;quot;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/147">Fix Failed Tax Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/10">Florida</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24709 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eye on the Right: Arizona&#039;s Failed Experiment with Tax Cuts</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
How are Arizona&#039;s right-wing legislators responding to the state&#039;s most severe fiscal crisis since the Great Depression?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Massive corporate income tax cuts, of course.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24557&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24557 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Revenue Options in 2010: Making the Case and Debunking the Myths</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24497</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last Tuesday, Oregonians overwhelmingly approved
two ballot initiatives that ratified legislative action last year to
increase high-end personal income and corporate taxes.  The failure of the anti-tax movement in Oregon
is one more in a long stream of right-wing initiatives
rejected by voters at the ballot box.  In fact, progressive revenue
generation as part of a balanced approach to addressing state deficits
has been popular with both voters and legislatures for years.  This &lt;i&gt;Dispatch&lt;/i&gt;
will provide both the facts and messages to debunk opposition to smart
revenue options, while outlining a few of the best revenue approaches
to filling budget holes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24497&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1777">Broaden Sales Taxes to Include Services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1838">Earned Income Tax Credit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/146">Make Tax Systems More Progressive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/153">Review and Sunset Tax Expenditures</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/149">Tax Disclosure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/154">Disclose Economic Development Subsidies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1780">Stop Tax Subsidy Bidding Wars</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1846">Corporate Transparency in State Budgets</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24497 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Making the Rich Pay their Fair Share on the Ballot in Oregon</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24414</link>
 <description>In 2009, Oregon lawmakers approved
HB 2649 and HB 3405, a balanced approach to dealing with their fiscal
problems that included increased taxes on the wealthiest state
residents and corporations.  These revenue increases were combined with
lowered taxes for people receiving unemployment insurance benefits,
offering tax relief to many families.  
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/24414&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/146">Make Tax Systems More Progressive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/38">Oregon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:56:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Altaf Rahamatulla</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24414 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Anti-Tax Forces Lose at Ballot/Split Decision on Gay Unions/Other Election Analysis</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23921</link>
 <description>While the governors&#039; races in New Jersey and Virginia got most of the headlines, other state races around the country delivered a mixed message by voters on a number of issues. Read more about anti-tax forces continue to fail at the ballot box, a split vote on gay and lesbian unions, how voters continue to support public investments, and more.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23921&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1818">Protecting Gay Civil Unions and Marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/165">Ballot Initiative Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/20">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23921 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On the Ballot: Defeating TABOR, Defending Relationship Equality Laws &amp; A Roundup of Other Ballot Issues</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23827</link>
 <description>Along with giving a roundup of the range of initiatives on the ballot in this off-year election, this&lt;i&gt; Dispatch &lt;/i&gt;will give special focus to the campaigns against TABOR and defending relationship equality laws.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23827&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1818">Protecting Gay Civil Unions and Marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1731">Public Financing of Judicial Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/165">Ballot Initiative Reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/20">Maine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/48">Washington</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:12:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nora Ranney</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23827 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big Business Already Giving Big to Take Down Oregon Tax Increase</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23372</link>
 <description>Earlier this year, policymakers in Oregon enacted both temporary
and permanent changes in the state’s tax system to help close an
enormous budget gap and, by extension, provide funding for vital
services like education, health care, and public safety... Yet, due to quirks
in Oregon’s legislative process, opponents of these changes have an
opportunity to put them before the voters for approval via referendum. 
Not surprisingly, representatives of big business and a who’s who of
anti-tax organizations are attempting to take full advantage of that
opportunity. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23372&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1838">Earned Income Tax Credit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1778">Make Corporations Pay Their Fair Share</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/38">Oregon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:50:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PSN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23372 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Progressive Revenue Measures Approved or Moving in Oregon and Other States</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23231</link>
 <description>Oregon became the latest state to address the current fiscal crisis with progressive revenue increases.  This is part of a welcome trend that we highlighted back in April
of states recognizing that budget cuts need to be balanced with
wealthier state residents being asked to pay their fair share to
address the effects of the economic downturn.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23231&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/1838">Earned Income Tax Credit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/38">Oregon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:02:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23231 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nutty, Dangerous &quot;Fair Tax&quot; Approved in Missouri House - Reports Highlight Likely Tax Increases for Working Families If Enacted</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23090</link>
 <description>If most state legislatures are considering reasonable revenue increases this year, a few, like Missouri&#039;s House, have been captured by rightwing anti-tax fundamentalists. 
One of the pet ideas of the far right in recent years has been
eliminating the income tax for both individuals and corporations and
replacing it with a sales tax applied to every transaction.  The
rightwing call it the &amp;quot;fair tax&amp;quot; and the Missouri House became the
first legislative chamber in the country to vote for a constitutional
amendment, HJR 36, that would put the issue to voters in 2010.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/23090&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/26">Missouri</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:06:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23090 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taxing High-Income Residents: Better than Budget Cuts, Better for Economic Growth</title>
 <link>http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22944</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
After resisting the proposal for months, &lt;b&gt;New York&lt;/b&gt; Governor Patterson has agreed with legislative leaders to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/nyregion/29tax.html?hp&quot;&gt;raise income taxes on the wealthiest state residents&lt;/a&gt; in order to help close the state budget gap.  “It’s a profound breakthrough for tax fairness,” said Dan Cantor, executive director of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.workingfamiliesparty.org/2009/04/victory-for-progressive-taxes/&quot; title=&quot;Working Families Party&quot;&gt;Working Families Party&lt;/a&gt;, an organization of New York individuals, labor unions and other groups that was a leader in the campaign to raise the tax rates.  The New York deal is part of a national movement of state leaders looking to raise new revenue from high-income residents to avoid budget cuts and fund needed investments for long-term economic recovery. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.progressivestates.org/node/22944&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/150">Promote Fair Income and Estate Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.progressivestates.org/taxonomy/term/152">Stop Rightwing Tax Campaigns</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:03:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nathan Newman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22944 at http://www.progressivestates.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
