Navigation

DISPATCH: Bipartisan Wins For Pro-Worker and Transparency Laws, Widespread Failure of SB1070 Copycat Bills, and a Loss For NC’s Economy

View this email online at http://www.progressivestates.org/node/28025

Common-Sense, Pro-Worker Law Enacted with Bipartisan Support in Maine

Workplace Standards for Families   *   Tim Judson

Last week, lawmakers in Maine enacted the first significant pro-worker law to come out of this year’s session. The Work-Sharing Bill, LD 269, creates a program that will help save thousands of jobs in future economic downturns. It passed with unanimous support in both legislative chambers in a session that has been characterized, like many other states’ sessions, by attacks on workers’ rights and the middle class.

Oregon Legislature Unanimously Approves Subsidy Transparency Legislation

Accountable Government   *   Altaf Rahamatulla

This month, the Oregon Legislature unanimously approved a bill to provide increased transparency of state spending on economic development subsidies. The legislation, HB2825, would require the Department of Administrative Services to publish detailed information regarding the amount, purpose, and intent of tax incentives directed to corporate entities on the state's transparency website. State Rep. Phil Barnhart (D), who sponsored the bill along with State Rep. Kim Thatcher (R), commented  that “spending on tax breaks should be treated the same as spending on programs,” and that “by putting this information online, as is currently the case with other areas of the budget, we move one step closer to that goal." The bill now awaits Gov. John Kitzhaber's signature.

States Continue to Reject Broad Anti-Immigrant Laws as Concern About Economic Effects Grows

Integrating Immigrants into Our Communities   *   Suman Raghunathan

As another round of state legislatures begin to wrap up their 2011 sessions and a flurry of positive action on immigration continues to gain momentum, it is becoming increasingly clear that anti-immigrant bills have failed to gain much traction at all in state legislatures across the nation. Even Arizona, which led the anti-immigrant charge by passing the now-infamous SB 1070 last year, is now reconsidering the wisdom of its actions and surveying the resulting destruction of its economy. Arizona’s legislature killed numerous additional anti-immigrant proposals earlier this session after a group of sixty CEOs of companies sent a letter  to State President Russell Pearce outlining the devastating effect SB 1070 and the resulting boycotts have had on the state, including over 3,000 lost jobs in the tourism industry alone.

North Carolina’s Economy Loses As Restrictions On Community Broadband Become Law

Broadband Buildout and Technology Investments   *   Fabiola Carrion

After multiple attempts in the past four legislative sessions, large telecommunications providers have finally succeeded at preventing municipalities from facilitating community broadband services in North Carolina. Despite expressing concerns that industry-supported legislation would result in poorer service for communities, Governor Bev Perdue failed to veto House Bill 129, allowing it to become law without her signature. The law is particularly detrimental in rural areas, where the private sector has refused to provide service because they do not see profits.

Quote Of The Week

“[This] is about access. Anyone can apply to college, but if they can't afford to pay it's not accessible.”

– State Sen. Beth Bye (D-CT) on Connecticut’s tuition equity bill, as quoted by @NewHavenPromiseon Twitter. The Senate passed the bill this week, sending it to the Governor for his expected signature into law.

Steps Forward

NJ: Senate passes bill to restore $7.45M in funding to family planning centers

PA: Bipartisan majority in House rejects drastic cuts to unemployment

US: Protections against gender identity discrimination advance


Steps Back

LA: In spite of revenue gap, Louisiana lawmakers consider repealing income taxes

NY: Effects of proposed property tax cap would be devastating

Back to top ^

Research Roundup: Paid Sick Days, Teacher Pay and Boondoggles Exposed

In this week’s PSN Research Roundup:

Reports by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities on the devastating impact that would result from proposed cuts to the WIC nutrition program, the Economic Opportunity Institute on how the social and economic implications of paid sick days for Seattle, WISPIRG on wasteful spending on infrastructure projects going to some of Gov. Walkers’ biggest campaign contributors in Wisconsin, the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts on the minimal effect of state taxes on migration, and the Center for American Progress on the unequal distribution of teacher quality among different communities.

Proposed WIC Cuts Would End Food Assistance for 325,000 to 475,000 Low-Income Women and Children – This report by Center on Budget and Policy Priorities outlines the devastating impact that would result from cuts being proposed by Congressional conservatives to the WIC nutrition program. The summary notes that the proposal is especially striking when compared to right-wing “insistence late last year on extending all of President Bush’s tax cuts for the nation’s wealthiest households.”

Evaluating Paid Sick Leave: Social, economic and health implications for Seattle – This study by the Economic Opportunity Institute looks at how paid sick days would affect the Seattle economy and quality of life for residents. It concludes that a paid sick leave policy would reduce the spread of diseases, strengthen childrens’ health, help victims of domestic violence and assault, and increase employee retention and reduce turnover.

Building Boondoggles?WISPIRG released this analysis of new, wasteful highway projects in Wisconsin, and highlights how Governor Scott Walker has financed them by slashing funds that would normally go to paying public workers for repair and maintenance. The highway projects, totalling almost $2 Billion, went to some of the biggest contributors to Gov. Walkers’ campaign. The report urges the state of Wisconsin to avoid wasting taxpayer money on “projects that have not been thoroughly reviewed and justified, especially when other vital transportation services, such as local road repair and transit, are being cut.”

The Impact of Taxes on Migration in New England – This recent paper by Jeff Thompson of the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, is one of many recent studies of the affect of state income tax rates on interstate migration. As other reports have also concluded, this study of New England states finds that “the available evidence suggests that the impact of taxes on cross-state migration decisions is weak.”

Speaking of Salaries: What It Will Take to Get Qualified, Effective Teachers in All Communities – This report by the Center for American Progress examines the unequal distribution of teacher quality among different communities by looking at data from California and New York. It provides suggestions for ways in which “federal policy can leverage strong steps toward ensuring every child has access to adequate school resources and quality teachers.”


Health Impact Assessment of Paid Sick Days Policy in New Jersey (Summary and Full Report) - This new report by Human Impact Partners shows definitively that what is good for working families is good for business, health care costs, and New Jersey as a whole.  Utilizing state and national data, as well as qualitative research, HIP reports that up to 34% of flu cases would be prevented by sick workers staying home -- potentially saving thousands of lives in the next major pandemic, which could result in 71,000 fatalities.  With one in six workers reporting job loss or punishment for taking a sick day, and workers without sick days substantially more likely to use emergency room care (+15%), delay necessary medical care (+40%), and report to work while sick (+50%), the lack of a paid sick days standard is a major burden on everyone, from     working families to their employers and the broader community of taxpayers.

Coal Mine Safety: Do Unions Make a Difference? - Unionized coal miners suffer substantially lower injury and fatality rates than workers in non-union mines, concludes Stanford Law Professor Alison D. Morantz in this empirical study of coal mine safety data.  Using comprehensive data from 1993-2008, Morantz reports that union miners experience up to 68% fewer fatalities and up to 33% fewer traumatic injuries, particularly in larger coal mine operations.  Alarmingly, the safety benefits to union coal miners has grown since the mid-1990s, affirming that non-union mines are not keeping pace with new regulations and best practices.

Please email us leads on good research at research@progressivestates.org

Back to top ^

The Stateside Dispatch is edited by:

Charles Monaco, Press and New Media Specialist

Contributors to the Dispatch include:

Nora Ranney, Legislative Director
Marisol Thomer, Outreach Director
Devin Boerm, Health Policy Specialist
Fabiola Carrión, Broadband and Green Jobs Policy Specialist
Cristina Francisco-McGuire, Election Reform Policy Specialist
Tim Judson, Workers' Rights Policy Specialist
Suman Raghunathan, Immigration Policy Specialist
Altaf Rahamatulla, Tax and Budget Policy Specialist
Mike Maiorini, Online Technology Manager
Ben Secord, Outreach Specialist

Please send us an email at dispatch@progressivestates.org if you have feedback, tips, suggestions, criticisms,or nominations for any of our sidebar features.

Back to top ^